Switch to an accessible version of this website which is easier to read. (requires cookies)

Welcome to Nottingham Liberal Democrats

Welcome to our website. The Liberal Democrats are now the only party that can deliver social justice. We are only choice for anyone who wants a fairer Britain.

We will put money back in the pockets of ordinary families. We will build a stable, green economy for each and every one of us. We will change politics so that every person counts.

Our intention is that this website will be a useful resource for local people to find out more about the local Liberal Democrats and the campaigns we are running.

However, we would like it to be more than that - we would like to hear from you. Online you can:

Recent updates

  • Article: Jan 26, 2012

    Broxtowe Liberal Democrats are aware that the leader of Broxtowe Borough Council, Labour Councillor Milan Radulovic, has been charged with an offence of fraud. This country has a long established and perfectly proper tradition that everyone should be treated as innocent unless and until a court finds them guilty. We respect and support that tradition. We do not therefore anticipate any changes to the leadership arrangements of the borough council at this time. We will not be making any further comment on this matter, either individually or as a group, until the conclusion of legal proceedings

  • orston rd empty home
    Article: Jan 25, 2012

    There is currently a shortage of homes in England with housing waiting lists growing all the time. At the moment there are 1 million empty homes with 350,000 of these being empty long term.

    There are too many empty homes left unused. If all of the empty homes were brought back in to use our country could half the housing waiting list.

  • Article: Jan 20, 2012

    Commenting on the Living Music Bill being approved by the House of Commons at Third Reading today, Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party Committee on Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, Don Foster said:

    "Private members' bills are rarely passed, and it's even rarer that they do so with the unanimous support of every MP as happened today.

    "The current system has had a deadening effect on the performance of live music in small venues. At the moment, the landlord of a small pub could face a big fine and imprisonment for letting a customer play a piano without a licence.

    "The support received this afternoon from all MPs from all political parties just goes to show how important live music is in our country and the overwhelming support for changing our obstructive licensing laws.

    "We're now only one step away from the Bill becoming law and creating an even more vibrant and successful live music culture. This will benefit hundreds of small pubs, restaurants, schools, churches and community halls, and strengthen the British music scene immensely."

    1. Changing Labour's draconian licensing laws to allow live music to be enjoyed in small venues without complicated licences was a Liberal Democrat manifesto commitment.
    1. The Live Music Bill is a Private Members Bill, which was first proposed by Liberal Democrat peer, Lord (Tim) Clement-Jones. It now goes back to the House of Lords for final approval.
    1. The Bill removes the need for a licence to play unamplified and amplified live music in cases where a few simple criteria are met. This will apply to most small venues, such as pubs and community halls.
    1. In March 2011, the Government announced it would lend its support the Bill.
  • Article: Jan 20, 2012
    By Leon Duveen - Campaign Manager, Bassetlaw & Sherwood Liberal Democrats

    Bassetlaw Lib Dems welcome the local MP, John Mann, joining our campaign for a new bus station for Worksop; we only ask what has taken him so long? The problem of the bus station has been a running sore in the heart of the town for many years and successive County & District Councils have done little to resolve the issue.

  • featherstone
    Article: Jan 18, 2012

    Liberal Democrat Home Office Minster, Lynne Featherstone has today announced enhanced checks for taxi drivers and private hire vehicles to ensure greater security and peace of mind for all taxi users, especially vulnerable people and women travelling alone.

    Commenting, Lynne Featherstone who is responsible for Criminal Information in the Home Office said:

    "Taxi drivers provide a valuable service for people in all walks of life, transporting some children to and from school, and lone women home after a night out.

    "It is right the public are confident the appropriate checks have been carried out before a taxi licence is granted.

    "As a Liberal Democrat, I'm committed to ensuring that any additional criminal checks strike a balance between a respect for civil liberties and responsibility to protect the public. The proposals will mean new taxi and private hire vehicle drivers are eligible for an enhanced criminal records check before they are issued with their licence. Current drivers will be required to have the additional checks when they apply to renew their licence.

    "The enhanced checks go beyond standard checks and disclose relevant non-conviction information held by local police forces and details of any information from the Independent Safeguarding Authority's barred list.

    "These proposals ensure that licensing authorities have all the information they need before approving a license and the public are protected and have greater peace of mind."

    Commenting further, Liberal Democrat Transport Minister Norman Baker said:

    "When you get into a taxi, particularly late at night, you want to have confidence that you are in safe hands. I therefore welcome this announcement which will make people feel more secure."

    Linda Craig, director of Suzy Lamplugh Trust, said:

    "Suzy Lamplugh Trust welcomes this announcement and believes that all licensing authorities should ask for enhanced checks in making decisions about granting licences. The public are encouraged to use licensed minicabs and taxis so these licences must deliver the safety the public expects."

  • Article: Jan 18, 2012

    Commenting on the cancellation of the Detainee Inquiry headed by Sir Peter Gibson, Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Committee on Home Affairs, Justice and Equality, Tom Brake said:

    "It is disappointing but inevitable that the inquiry has been shelved.

    "We must get to the bottom of these allegations of mistreatment as soon as possible. The credibility of our intelligence services depends on it.

  • Difficult Choices
    Article: Jan 18, 2012
    By Tim Farron MP, President of the Liberal Democrats in Liberal Democrat Voice

    Are 2 Eds better than one? I'm not sure - but the two Eds said something very interesting over the weekend: apparently they don't have a 'Plan B' for the economy after all!

    As I drove into the village of Haverthwaite on Saturday morning to do some residents' surveying, I was preparing to turn the radio off and then Ed Balls popped up. I listened with amazement. In his interview he admitted not only that the programme of cuts being carried out by the Coalition government were right, but that Labour would not over turn them if they were in Government. Unfortunately however he didn't go as far as to admit that the cause behind all the cuts - the dire economic situation - was in fact largely his fault.

    You'll have heard Simon Hughes and me over the weekend rightly calling on the two Eds to apologise. We want them to apologise to the British public for deceiving them for 18 months before finally admitting that what the Liberal Democrats have been doing in Government is broadly the right approach. However, there is one apology we didn't call for publicly, but which they still should make - that's an apology to you!

    Last May across the country, from Lancaster to Sheffield and Manchester to Newcastle, many of you lost your council seats to undeserving Labour candidates who were fighting their elections on a false platform with dishonest messages. They stood on a platform that the Eds now admit was wrong. Shame on them - but I'm proud of you.

    In addition, Nick Clegg deserves an apology. Nick has been berated and abused by the Labour leadership over the last 18 months for having the guts to stand up and work as part of the Coalition in the best interest of the country. Now Labour have admitted that their attacks were inaccurate - but there's no hint of apology. They have gone from being in the wrong place, to all over the place.

    I don't expect the apology to come, and we definitely didn't need Ed and Ed's endorsement to motivate us for the next set of elections, but their cack-handed u-turn is certainly an encouragement.

    This May I expect us to beat Labour in areas we couldn't last year as their dishonesty has now been exposed (voluntarily, which is nice of them!). Of course we now have the inevitable Labour infighting as the Unions start going potty, accusing Ed and Ed of betrayal and breaking pledges (sound familiar?).

    That leaves the Liberal Democrats as the only political party with the backbone to tackle the country's problems, but with the heart to do everything to ensure that fairness, compassion and justice are written through everything we do.

    As this article from The Times recognises, the Liberal Democrats are a progressive force in Government. We are the Party delivering tax cuts for working people, we are the party investing in the poorest school pupils, we are the party delivering the largest ever state pension rise and importantly, we are the party prepared to take the tough decisions needed to get this country back on track.

    Anyhow, after Mr Balls had stopped not-quite-apologising on the radio last Saturday, I turned the car radio off, got out and spent 3 hours knocking on doors. The response I got, by the way, was fantastic. It struck me that just as Labour was making its U turn, the Lib Dems may have just turned the corner…

    So don't hold your breath waiting for an apology from Labour - but rest assured you are most definitely owed one!

  • Norman Lamb
    Article: Jan 18, 2012
    By Norman Lamb MP in Liberal Democrat Voice

    In the debate on so-called crony capitalism two things are clear. First there is genuine and widespread anger at corporate greed and irresponsible capitalism. Second, politicians from the left have been groping around, without much success, trying to come up with convincing responses. Ed Miliband drew a distinction between producers and predators. But he failed to offer any answers.

    We see power and wealth concentrated in the hands of the few - the benefits of success going to those at the top rather than being fairly shared between all those who generated that wealth. Even worse, company bosses too often get far more than their performance could ever justify. Last year, total earnings of directors of FTSE 100 companies increased by 49% whilst their companies saw only a 3% rise in value.

    As the world struggles to adjust to the shock that the economic system has faced over the last three years, we are searching for a more sustainable, more responsible and fairer form of capitalism. Yesterday, Nick Clegg came up with some answers. In particular, he argued that this should be the decade of employee share ownership. I hope that his speech comes to be seen as a seminal moment.

    John Stuart Mill identified the 'standing feud between capital and labour'. He argued that employee owned firms could be the answer. Ever since then Liberals and Liberal Democrats have advocated this cause.

    In opposition, as Shadow Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, I argued for Royal Mail workers to benefit from a John Lewis style Trust. Now in Government we have legislated for this. But the agenda is far wider.

    Some traditionalists dismiss employee ownership as a woolly Liberal ideal which will always be peripheral. They are wrong. The economic evidence is clear.

    Research by the Cass Business School shows that employee owned businesses are just as profitable as traditional companies. During the recession they proved to be more resilient. Their performance is more stable over the business cycle. When times were really tough employee owned businesses grew sales much faster than their traditional counterparts. Crucially, employee owned businesses consistently recruited more staff and rewarded them with higher wages. Other evidence shows that, invariably, the pay gap between the top and the average worker is much smaller - meaning that the fruits of their labours are shared more fairly.

    Productivity also outshines the traditional company. Performance is best when a share in ownership is matched by empowering staff to play a part in decision making. And when you think about it, this isn't rocket science. In my time as an employment lawyer, I heard countless stories of frustration from staff who knew their workplace better than anyone, who had ideas about how you could work more efficiently, yet they were never listened to. This experience is commonplace in both public and private sectors. Give those people some autonomy in decision-making and they are likely to rise to the challenge. Give them a stake in the business and they will feel a sense of ownership. Motivation grows. Importantly, happiness at work can grow.

    So, Liberals understand why this makes sense. But how do we spread the message? How can we make this more than peripheral to the economy?

    Action is needed in three areas.

    First, we have to increase the awareness of employee ownership in all its forms and break down the barriers which prevent growth. For those setting up a company, there must be an off the shelf option they can consider. And as Nick announced yesterday, the Government will appoint an independent adviser - an expert in the field - who will shortly report on how we can simplify employee ownership.

    For existing employees, we must look at introducing a right to request that their company establish an employee share scheme. This is a good nudge in the right direction. Company owners may then be encouraged to consider, perhaps for the first time, the potential financial benefits of giving employees a stake.

    Second, we have to look at tax incentives. If we have evidence of the value of employee share ownership to the economy, doesn't it make sense to improve the incentives for companies to set up share schemes?

    Third, we have to examine the critical issue of access to finance. Companies need finance to grow but for businesses owned by employee benefit trusts - such as John Lewis - they face real difficulties, particularly in the early stages, in getting access to finance. What role can the banks and other institutions play? Should we consider a dedicated venture capital fund for mutuals and employee owned businesses?

    This is an exciting moment. Liberal Democrats in Government are leading this debate. And the first steps set in motion by Nick Clegg this week could have a decisive, Liberal impact on our economy and in our workplaces that will be felt for years to come.

    Come and Listen to Norman Lamb MP

    East Midlands Spring Conference - Saturday 18th February - Book Here -

  • Skate Park
    Article: Jan 17, 2012
    By Paul Varnsverry in Paul Varnsverry Delapre & Briar Hill Focus Team Northampton South

    Paul Varnsverry has criticised a decision by Northampton Borough Council Conservative cabinet member, Councillor Tim Hadland, to withdraw the planning application for Northampton's skate park, which was due to be determined by the planning committee on February 7th, 2012.

    "I am bitterly disappointed to learn that Councillor Hadland has unilaterally taken the decision to withdraw the planning application for the skate park. He may have the powers to do so, but it is the wrong decision. I am investigating whether his decision falls within the criteria for call-in to the council's Overview & Scrutiny committee.

  • Fred Dunford and Baroness Celia Thomas in Waterlooville
    Article: Jan 16, 2012

    Commenting on the news the Coalition Government has accepted a Liberal Democrat amendment to the Welfare Reform Bill to halve the time seriously disabled people will have to wait to be eligible for Personal Independence Payments (PIP) from six months to three months, Member of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party Committee on Work and Pensions, Baroness [Celia] Thomas, who tabled the amendment, said:

All films